| JuryFury.com
Now Every 15th of the Month ! Online School of Politics JuryFury
Chat
I-Traderschool
QuietPoly.com
Contributors
Research
Future
Discussions Sept. 15th, 2004
|
|||
| Areas of Interest THE USA American Foreign Policy US House and Senate US Presidents State & Local Politics Regional Politics Politics of China The British Commonwealth Indian Subcontinent Middle East The European Union Africa Latin America ASEAN NATO United Nations The Non-aligned Movement Eastern Europe New Nations of the 20th Century General Topics Constitutional Law Human Rights Nuclear Disarmament & Treaties International Warfare Environmental Law Peace Treaties Economic & Social Alliances International Organizations Journalism & Media Racism and Democracy Women in the Workplace Family Law Courts and Practices The Judicial System Higher Education Education and Government Health Care & Insurance Rights of the Disabled Copyright & Working Online Legal Representation Legal Insurance Pornography Domestic Violence Religion & Law Workers Rights Employers Rights Prison & Life after Social Organizations Welfare & Poverty Taxation and Democracy Third World Aid Programs Space Exploration Alternative Energy Petroleum Industry & Cars Nuclear Power Programs for the Arts Sports Education Policing the Internet Privacy and freedom Immigration Food and Regulation War on Drugs War on Pharmaceuticals Public Housing Pollution and Control Sexual Harrassment Discrimination Electoral Process Consumers Rights Investors Rights Abortion Death Penalty Social Security Gender & Sexuality Grassroots Organization ACLU World Watch Oxfam UNICEF United Negro Fund Ford Foundation (suggestions welcome at our chatsite) Law of the Economy Join I-Traderschool, our sister magazine, for debates and news. |
Internet & Freedom
Internet Security: ISP Responsibility by Candida B Eittriem My husband came home last night and told me about an incident that left me torn, as it speaks to the heart of the issue of Internet safety. Someone he knows, who works within his company, was denied continued service by his ISP. Why? Because his ISP claims his home desktop is acting as a server for the Russian Mafia, and branching out to over 500 different machines. They are not claiming he is responsible in any way, but insist he remain offline until his computer is clean. Knowing what I do about systems security at the network admin level, this troubles me. Here is a person who exercised reasonable and prudent care with his desktop. He used firewall/ant-virus software, and never opened attachments. How can then his ISP deny him service, when at their level, this could have been prevented or stopped, by having top notch IT security personnel, and state of the art ids systems? A network intrusion detection system, along with packet inspection, and good logging could have caught this. Is this going to be the start of a new ISP reaction? If so, I think there needs to be input from the public on this. For starters, here is mine: anyone not using firewall/anti-virus programs should be denied service by any responsible ISP. This is reasonable and prudent, given the increasing DDOS/DOS attacks on corporate servers. If an individual reports finding Trojans, involved with such attacks, and reports it, they should NOT be denied service. Instead the ISP security department should, in my opinion, either through remote or actual physical inspection, look at the compromised machine, its logs and attempt to find when the Trojan was planted, and if possible, look for any known footprints or methodology. This information is vital in ascertaining how serious the threat might be to their servers/public domain. This isn't extraordinary, it's just good basic forensics and investigative procedure. The security tech could then instruct the client on how to rid their machine safely of the bot/zombie/Trojan. ISP's charge people money to utilize their networks, and yet do very little in the way of being responsive to real security issues, which after all, in the hands of skilled crackers, can be breached. To simply deny service, leave the hapless consumer lost and not knowing even how to begin ridding his system of the Trojan, is unfair and unreasonable. We as consumers have a responsibility too. To be aware that the net is simply a huge flow of information, broken into tiny bytes, flowing constantly through the lines. Because of this, anything one person does online can potentially impact thousands. People are still forwarding huge chain e-mails, any one of which might be infected, and think it's just fun. Or clicking on unfamiliar e-mails, and discover, gasp, I got a virus. Well guess what? You and your 137 brothers and sisters got it too, thanks to one careless moment. A fellow chatter, happily babbling about her new baby, offers to send you a photo. You say aww sure and give him/her your e-mail. Did you know, malicious script can be embedded in photos. And Mizz Babbler and cooer, is actually hostile and seeking victims of opportunity? The `net has become the playground of professional cons and criminal groups. We can't be so naïve and trusting here. I don't want to see the Internet become a police state, but I do think we all need to help make it more secure. And that begins with your own system. Secure it well, especially those of us in business online. Run diagnostics, defragment weekly and download kerio firewall, and check for intrusions. www.kerio.com. If you find Trojans listed in their log boxes, take the time to look up which type of Trojan -- they are here. If you have none, thank the computer gods, and uninstall kerio. I found a very good firewall -- See Agnitium.com -- it outperforms all other firewalls I've tried, and it is easy to configure. An excellent anti-virus, free to home users is Avast. It is extremely good and easy to use. If your system is totally compromised, go buy a CD to erase your hard drive, using a DOD recommended 70 pass and shred wipe. Before going back online, load your firewall and anti-virus first and scan. As for my husband’s co-worker. I advised him to file a Federal class-action lawsuit against his ISP, in order to compel them to exercise more concern AND responsibility towards their customers. I believe this will be the only way to make them realize they can't continue to reap enormous profits, without being responsive and responsible. It makes me wonder too. We live in the same area, is what is happening to me, related, and if so, why won't this ISP do something about it? Note: Suggestions made about computer security are solely by the author of the article and not by QuietPoly Inc., which is the owner of Juryfury.com. Please use your discretion when downloading software from the Internet. About the Author(s): See under Our Contributors to find out about the Author(s) of this article. |
Yahoo! World News Headlines Our Winners Club Our Contributors Research Links Legal Advice ALL Awards & Internships Become an Activist Join an Organization Get Volunteerism Alert Write Letters to a local Politician Start your own Group Applied Politics Projects Suggest a Project Start your Yahoo Groups Get Internship Credit Funding for Projects Encourage Discussion Join Juryfury Chat Promote Juryfury.com Join online discussion Groups Be In the Spotlight Let us Interview you : Authors of political books Activists Journalists Lawyers Law Enforcement Politicians Politican Scientists Be A Columnist Get Internship Credit Write twice a Month Get Heard Start a Yahoo Group Advertise with Us Books (Free) Political Our Staff & Contributors Our Magazines Quietpoly.com I-Traderschool Juryfury.com The Company Our Address: QuietPoly Inc. 240 W. Saunders. Dr. (#146) Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Tel (928) 214-7365 quietpoly@yahoo.com |
|