JuryFury.com                                                                                       A New Issue Every Monday !   SUBSCRIBE NOW !!
Online School of Politics

JuryFury Chat     I-Traderschool     QuietPoly.com    Contributors   Research     Future Discussions                               
Areas of Interest



THE USA

American Foreign Policy

US House and Senate
US Presidents
State & Local Politics




Regional Politics
Politics of China
The British Commonwealth
Indian Subcontinent
Middle East
The European Union
Africa
Latin America
ASEAN
NATO
United Nations
The Non-aligned Movement
Eastern Europe
New Nations of the 20th Century



General Topics
Constitutional Law
Human Rights
Nuclear Disarmament & Treaties
International Warfare
Environmental Law
Peace Treaties
Economic & Social Alliances
International Organizations
Journalism & Media
Racism and Democracy
Women in the Workplace
Family Law
Courts and Practices
The Judicial System
Higher Education
Education and Government
Health Care & Insurance
Rights of the Disabled
Copyright & Working Online
Legal Representation
Legal Insurance
Pornography
Domestic Violence
Religion & Law
Workers Rights
Employers Rights
Prison & Life after
Social Organizations
Welfare & Poverty
Taxation and Democracy
Third World Aid Programs
Space Exploration
Alternative Energy
Petroleum Industry & Cars
Nuclear Power
Programs for the Arts
Sports Education
Policing the Internet
Privacy and freedom
Immigration
Food and Regulation
War on Drugs
War on Pharmaceuticals
Public Housing
Pollution and Control
Sexual Harrassment
Discrimination
Electoral Process
Consumers Rights
Investors Rights
Abortion
Death Penalty
Social Security

Gender & Sexuality



Grassroots Organization
ACLU
World Watch
Oxfam
UNICEF
United Negro Fund
Ford Foundation

(suggestions welcome at  our chatsite)



Law of the Economy

Join
I-Traderschool,
our sister magazine,
for debates and news.




US double standards





Foreign Claims Act : an unfair law?
By Sophia Barkat



The article linked suggests that the wrongful death lawsuits of Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan by US Military must be tried under Afghani Law.
http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20030516/USUITN/National/Idx

"The action falls under the Foreign Claims Act in the United States and requires the family to use the legal statutes of the country where the incident took place." (quoting link)

The lawyer representing the family of the Canadian soldier remarked, "How could you follow a law put in place by a group of rogues in a country just overthrown by the U.S. and its allies? Afghanistan had no law. We're jumping a bit here."

I'm not sure what kind of laws existed in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan for the kind of dispute in consideration or whether it is better or worse than US Law though it seems that suing the Government can only lead to monetary settlements.  It appears the families of the deceased prefer criminal or military trials and to see the guilty parties punished, grounded, not allowed to fly, rather than  press charges against the US Government.

From the article it seems that US law indicates that deaths of foreign nationals by US friendly-fire can be settled via lawsuits only. It is as though American guilty parties are safe from criminal or military prosecution by a foreign government. The US wishes the guilty party - whether civilian or military - on it's own. It therefore dictates that miilitary cases be settled via lawsuits between foreign governments. In contrast, the US spares no time to prosecute
foreign war criminals in it's military courts - if you consider what's happening these days.

I don't know why the US law dictates the lawsuit should be tried in the country in which the incident took place. Perhaps it is to evoke a sense of fairness in the trial, as though to cover-up the actual problem with the process -- the fact that such disputes lead to no criminal prosecution.

I wonder if trying the US Govt. In this lawsuit under Afghan law would lead to a more fair judgement.





Encourage Discussion
Join Juryfury Chat
Promote Juryfury.com
Join online discussion Groups





Archives





Writers Needed

Be a Columnist
Be an Editor
Become an Owner
Writing Training Program
Internship Program for Students






Advertise with Us




About Us

Our Staff & Contributors
Our Magazines
   Quietpoly.com
   I-Traderschool
   Juryfury.com
The Company






Our Address:
QuietPoly Inc.
240 W. Saunders. Dr. (#146)

Flagstaff, AZ 86001
Tel (928) 214-7365
quietpoly@yahoo.com






Our Affiliations
(pending member)
MediaChannel.org
IndyMedia.org