October
15, 2005 Issue
Communism & China
A Bit of History to Illustrate the Role of China’s Military
by Robert M. Liu
In the late 1940s, shortly before Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek’s
Nationalist Government in Nanking collapsed, the official figure on China’s
population was 450 million. Then came the victorious Communists led by Mao
Zedong who founded The People’s Republic of China in the Chinese mainland
in 1949, as the Nationalists (also known as the Kuomintang or KMT) fled
to Taiwan and continued to rule the island in the name of The Republic of
China.
By the late 1950s, the population in the Chinese mainland had grown to 600
million. Today, China boasts a population of 1.3 billion, not including
the 23 million residents in Taiwan.
These alarming population growth data suggest that whoever is in charge in
Beijing has an enormous responsibility to ensure sustained economic growth
so as to feed the country’s huge population and that should anything go
wrong with the economy, it is likely to trigger serious controversy between
the Marxist ideologues and the pragmatic moderates in the ruling Communist
Party of China (the CPC).
The thing is that politicians in any country have different opinions on how
to maintain sustained economic growth. Take America as an example. The supply-side
economists of the Republican Party hold that lower tax rates plus deregulation
(i.e. less unfriendly regulation) for businesses (i.e. the suppliers of
goods and services) will help maintain sustained economic growth.
Whereas the left-leaning Democrats believe that higher taxes on "the rich",
punitive regulations for business, higher minimum wages, generous welfare
programs and labor protections will bring prosperity -- despite the fact
that years of experiment in Germany with exactly such measures have led
to high unemployment and economic stagnation. Apparently, there are people
who confuse ideological wishful thinking with sound economic theory.
[By the way, in case you don’t know, to raise the minimum wage is actually
an effective way to create artificial inflation, since the costs of minimum
wage increases will have to be passed on to consumers. Besides, an increase
in the minimum wage from US$5 and change to US$7 and change as the Democrats
demand would artificially drive up the relative value of a minimum-wage
earner’s services, as opposed to, say, the services of a nurse or a doctor
or a politician, thereby distorting the relative value of the latter’s services.
Before long, the latter would come to demand wage increases too, and the
costs would have to be passed on to consumers.]
In 1950s China, Mao’s Socialist economic policies were strictly based on
Marxist ideology: agricultural collectivization and industrial nationalization.
In 1958, Mao, who was chairman of the CPC’s Central Committee, state president,
and chairman of the CPC’s Central Military Commission, launched a drive
to establish People’s Communes in rural areas, forcing peasants to form
into Production Teams. In consequence, peasant households lost accountability
and incentive. Soon a countrywide famine set in, causing the unnatural death
of an estimated 30 million people.
In the meantime, Mao called for a Great Leap Forward (i.e. a big increase)
in industrial production. In response to his call, state-run enterprises
built new industrial production capacities, boosting output at an incredible
pace. Unfortunately, they turned out large quantities of substandard products
for which there was no market demand. The Great Leap Forward thus led to
a great waste of resources.
One of the CPC’s high-ranking officials took it upon himself to investigate
the status of China’s economy though he was not an economist. It was Peng
Dehuan, one of the ten field marshals of the People’s Liberation Army (the
PLA) and the minister of national defense. In summer of 1959, Marshal Peng
Dehuan submitted the result of his investigation to the Central Committee
of the CPC, criticizing the dire consequences of Mao’s People’s-Commune-and-Great-Leap-Forward
drive.
For this, Peng Dehuan was fired as minister of national defense. Mao would
not tolerate anyone of questionable loyalty staying in that important position.
The man replacing Peng Dehuan as minister of national defense was Lin Biao,
also one of the ten field marshals of the PLA. As Mao’s close ally, the
new minister of national defense soon started a campaign to study Mao’s
writings in the military, which later would lead to a nationwide cult of
"Great Leader Chairman Mao".
Unable to clear up the mess created by himself, Mao now had no choice but
to resign his position as state president and let the moderates assume the
responsibility to fix the economy, while remaining as party chairman and
chairman of the CPC’s Central Military Commission. This way, he managed
to stay in control of the military through his close ally, Marshal Lin Biao.
At the time, the moderates included Premier Zhou Enlai, the new state president
Liu Shaoqi, and general secretary Deng Xiaoping, who would later become
China’s paramount leader and launch his world-famous market-oriented economic
reforms.
In those days, the top job in the CPC was party chairman, not general secretary.
The general secretary was supposed to take orders from the party chairman.
But by the mid-1960s, Mao was aware that control of the party machine had
slipped out of his hand. In other words, provincial CPC committee officials
were taking orders from the moderates, not from Chairman Mao.
In order to regain control, the Great Leader launched his infamous Great
Proletarian Cultural Revolution in spring of 1966 with the help of his close
ally Marshal Lin Biao, who had been Mao’s point man to see to the military.
The Cultural Revolution caused millions of people to be persecuted, including
state president Liu Shaoqi who was tortured to death, general secretary
Deng Xiaoping who was paraded and humiliated in public, and a number of
PLA generals. In addition, a large number of provincial CPC committee officials
were ousted because of their ties to the moderates in the central government
and the Central Committee of the CPC.
Now, the question is: Was Great Leader Chairman Mao really in control of
the military?
On the surface, yes, he was until he died in September 1976. Without the
support of at least part of the military, Mao could not have started his
Cultural Revolution to purge the Communist Party machine.
But there were signs that the Great Leader controlled only part of the military,
not the entire military, and that it was years before his death that he
lost control of the military altogether, which made it possible for favorable
major events (and changes for the better) to occur afterwards. I will try
to establish the time of Mao losing control later in this article.
Three years into the Cultural Revolution, it became clear that the Chinese
economy was about to collapse because many of those capable of running the
economy had been ousted. In the meantime, if Mao had been successful in
purging the party machine, he and his close ally Lin Biao had apparently
met with tough resistance in purging the military.
In those days, there were eight major Military Regions in China. In each
Military Region, there was a Military Region Command. In theory, the Commander
of a Military Region was supposed to take orders from the CPC’s Central
Military Commission, of which Mao and his close ally Lin Biao were chairman
and vice-chairman respectively.
But apart from Mao and Lin Biao, there were other powerful and very much
respected figures on the Central Military Commission, such as Premier Zhou
Enlai and Marshal Ye Jianying, another well-known moderate. From whom the
Commanders of the Military Regions were taking orders during the Cultural
Revolution was anybody’s guess. They might have taken orders from Premier
Zhou Enlai and Marshal Ye Jianying, rather than from Mao’s close ally Lin
Biao.
In early autumn of 1969, the CPC held its 9th Congress, which "elected" Mao’s
close ally Lin Biao vice-chairman of the CPC’s Central Committee -- heir
apparent to Great Leader Chairman Mao. In this manner, Mao and his radical
left-wing followers declared victory. In fact, it was a Pyrrhic victory
for them, and soon they would have to pay dearly.
In my judgment, sometime between the close of the CPC’s 9th Congress in September
of 1969 and the 2nd Plenary Session of the 9th Central Committee of the
CPC in summer of 1970, both Mao and his close ally Lin Biao became aware
that they had lost control of the military as the Commanders of the Military
Regions were ignoring their orders.
According to a book published in China in the 1990s, entitled "The Romance
of The People’s Republic of China", during the run-up to the 2nd Plenary
Session of the 9th Central Committee of the CPC, Mao repeatedly hinted that
he would not assume the post of state president. And yet, at the 2nd Plenary
Session of the 9th Central Committee of the CPC, his close ally Lin Biao
insisted that the Great Leader should be state president.
Thus, there were signs of differences of opinion between the Great Leader
and Lin Biao. Then, in early October of 1970 during the celebration of the
21st anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, Mao
told his guest, American writer Edgar Snow, that he found the title "Great
Leader" and individual cult disgusting.
Since it was Lin Biao who had created the cult of Great Leader Chairman Mao
in the military (no doubt with Mao’s consent), for Mao to call the Mao cult
disgusting was a clear indication that the Great Leader was trying to distance
himself from Lin Biao. The question is: why?
In my opinion, it was because Mao knew very well that his close ally Lin
Biao had lost control of the military, that by extension he himself had
also lost control of the military, and that if he did not distance himself
from Lin Biao, he would fall into disgrace as well. To save his own skin,
the Great Leader had to create signs of differences of opinion between himself
and Lin Biao.
One year later in October 1971, the Chinese public was told that Lin Biao
had died in a plane crash in the People’s Republic of Mongolia as he and
his family were fleeing from China in September 1971 after his unsuccessful
attempt on the life of Chairman Mao. Sounds like a tale from Arabian Nights
to me.
What really happened to Lin Biao in September 1971 was a mystery. What became
clear to the public was that after the September 1971 incident, Mao’s physical
condition quickly deteriorated -- an indication that the Great Leader was
not optimistic about his own political future.
Soon, good news for the country began to emerge. First, in late 1971, the
Chinese government announced that U.S. president Richard Nixon would visit
China the following year. It was a signal that China was ready to open its
door to the outside world. But who had made that decision? Great Leader
Chairman Mao or the moderates led by Premier Zhou Enlai?
At the time, the Chinese public was made to believe that it was Mao who had
decided to normalize China’s relations with the United States because China
was under pressure from the Soviet Union.
In retrospect, I believe that it was the moderates led by Premier Zhou Enlai
who were calling the shots. Mao was only a sick old man with no choice but
to agree to the moderates’ decisions.
At heart, the Great Leader was unhappy, complaining to his wife, Jiang Qing,
that the moderates were guilty of "capitulationism". Therefore, three years
after Nixon’s 1972 China visit, even as Premier Zhou Enlai’s health began
to suddenly deteriorate, Mao’s wife, Jiang Qing, staged a left-wing comeback
in the Chinese media, severely criticizing "capitulationism".
Now that the left-wing radicals no longer had the support of the military,
they didn’t dare categorically accuse Premier Zhou Enlai of capitulating
to U.S. imperialism. Instead, they told the public that Chairman Mao recently
had been critical of Song Jiang, the leading character in a popular ancient
Chinese historical novel "Waterside" who eventually capitulated to the Song
Dynasty (960--1279).
While Jiang Qing’s media campaign did create the impression that the left-wing
radicals still wielded enormous influences, it could not change the reality
on the ground -- the Commanders of the Military Regions were now taking orders
from the moderates. So, although the leader of the moderates, Premier Zhou
Enlai, died at the beginning of 1976, the moderates were able to have Mao’s
wife, Jiang Qing, and her left-wing colleagues arrested, as soon as Mao
died in September 1976.
Today, as the pragmatic moderates of the ruling CPC try to improve U.S.-China
relations and trade ties, they are apparently under pressure from the hardline
ideologues in the CPC and the military who suggest that the moderates are
too soft on "U.S. hegemonism".
Times have changed, and certain political terminologies may have changed
too, though the meaning of "being soft on U.S. hegemonism" is not very far
from that of "capitulationism". The determinant factor in Chinese politics,
however, remains the same -- the military. Whoever controls the military
calls the shots in Beijing.
About the Author: Please see
our list of Contributors for details.
|